- Public System Organisation
- Instructional Design
Instructional Reform Process
A sequenced method for diagnosing instructional problems, designing responses, testing them in classrooms and improving implementation at scale.
Shikha’s frameworks translate research into practical structures that educators and institutions can adopt and adapt.

Frameworks have been listed under three categories: planning, teaching and scaling. Filter the catalogue by laboratory; a framework may be linked to more than one lab.
32 frameworks
A sequenced method for diagnosing instructional problems, designing responses, testing them in classrooms and improving implementation at scale.
Explains how purpose, belonging, autonomy, competence and meaningful challenge combine to sustain students’ engagement in learning.
Organises goals into conceptual understanding, disciplinary practice and general aptitude so curriculum and assessment remain balanced.
A decision framework for choosing the knowledge, practices, capabilities and values that deserve sustained curricular time.
Identifies the ways experts notice, reason, represent evidence and make decisions within a discipline, then translates them into teachable practices.
Defines transferable dispositions and capabilities that help learners exercise judgement, collaborate, adapt and contribute meaningfully.
A structured reflection tool that connects classroom evidence, instructional decisions, professional goals and the next cycle of practice.
Maps distinct roles for AI—such as coach, planner, critic and collaborator—to specific educator tasks and safeguards.
Clarifies which human capabilities education must protect and strengthen as increasingly capable AI becomes part of everyday work.
Designs rigorous, joyful units by aligning mastery, authentic application and transfer across a coherent learning sequence.
Reusable lesson structures for provocation, instruction, analysis, discussion, research, creation, review, mastery and exhibition.
A disciplined process for moving from aims and standards to progression, units, lessons, materials, assessment and field validation.
Integrates reading, writing, speaking, listening, language knowledge and authentic communication across a clear progression.
Organises practical, creative and technical learning through progressive challenges, guided practice, projects and exhibitions.
A quality guide for ensuring projects have worthwhile questions, disciplinary rigour, authentic outputs, feedback and public demonstration.
Efficient assessments that identify essential literacy, numeracy and developmental foundations and guide timely instructional support.
Builds frequent evidence checks into instruction so teachers and students can adjust learning before final evaluation.
Designs valid end-point assessments that sample intended goals, demand application and produce interpretable evidence of learning.
Structures how students select evidence, explain decisions, reflect on growth and demonstrate increasingly complex competence over time.
A common architecture for professional learning that combines concepts, modelling, rehearsal, workplace application, feedback and evidence.
A repeatable cycle of observation, evidence-based feedback, goal setting, supported practice and follow-up for teacher growth.
Defines the minimum reliable evidence schools need, who collects it, how often and how it informs improvement decisions.
Aligns indicators, responsibilities, verification and review routines so system leaders receive usable evidence without overburdening schools.
Defines observable bands of teaching competence that can guide development, evidence portfolios, recognition and career progression.
Describes the knowledge, practices and evidence required to lead learning, people, operations, culture and continuous improvement.
Brings together culture, cognitive demand, participation, feedback and classroom routines into an observable picture of strong instruction.
Defines quality across leadership, teaching, student experience, operations, community relationships and evidence-led improvement.
A practical cycle for diagnosing priorities, selecting interventions, assigning ownership, monitoring implementation and revising the plan.
Tests whether an institution has a clear mandate, decision rights, roles, capabilities, workflows, information and accountability.
Maps how policy, institutions, people, finance, data and support structures must align to deliver educational quality at scale.
Assesses whether teams possess the skills, structures, resources and operating conditions required to fulfil their mandate.
Collects structured feedback from students, families, educators and officials to identify service gaps and improvement priorities.
No frameworks match this selection.